Painkiller Abuse: Big Problem Needs Smart Solutions
Abuse of prescription opiates (powerful pain killers) and rising overdose death rates are a huge problem in Washington and across the nation. Since 2007, overdoses have been the leading cause of accidental injury death in Washington, ahead of motor vehicle and firearm accidents. In 2009, there were 794 unintentional overdose deaths in Washington state. Overdose death rates have also skyrocketed nationwide, leading to nearly 28,000 deaths in 2007 alone. This jump in mortalities is largely driven by increasing use of prescription opiates such as OxyContin and methadone, although many people still overdose from illicit opiates such as heroin.
In response to these developments, the Office of National Drug Control Policy recently released a plan focusing on prescription opiate abuse. It provides for a combination of education, enhancement of prescription monitoring services across state lines, proper medical disposal of prescription medications, and increased law enforcement practices (primarily targeting prescribers). Elements of this plan should be applauded, most notably the education and drug disposal provisions.
However, the plan relies far too heavily on failed criminalization policies of the past and does nothing to combat non-prescription opiate abuse. This is shortsighted, because the line between prescription drug abuse and illicit drug abuse is blurring. Recent evidence indicates that individuals are starting with prescription opiates and then switching to heroin to maintain their habit.
To save lives, what’s needed is a comprehensive approach that targets both prescription and illicit opiates, and which includes a variety of harm reduction policy solutions - not just punitive policing practices. Here are a few strategies that should be considered to help prevent individuals from overdosing on opiates, whether they are prescription drugs or heroin:
Safe-Injection Facilities
These facilities bring intravenous drug users off the streets and out of alleyways into supervised settings where they are monitored and offered access to services. They’re used across the globe, and they’ve made their way to North America.
In 2003, Vancouver, B.C., opened North America’s first safe-injection site. It targets the significant IV drug-using population in the city’s Downtown Eastside neighborhood. At Insite, medical professionals supervise users to detect and intervene in overdose situations, and to ensure that users have access to sterile syringes to help prevent the spread of disease. The site also provides referrals to addiction treatment and mental health assistance. In 2009, the site recorded over 275,000 visits and 484 overdose reversals; there were no fatalities.
Insite's success is impossible to ignore. A recent study published by The Lancet reported a 35% decrease in Vancouver's drug overdose fatalities in the first year after the facility's opening. Additionally, Insite created a dramatic improvement in public order, including decreases in unsafely discarded syringes and injection-related litter. Drug-related crimes in the area, such as vehicle-related break-ins and thefts, also showed significant declines. Users shared syringes at dramatically lower rates, helping to reduce the spread of HIV/AIDS and other health risks. Further, the site has provided crucial research and education on the prevention of overdose fatalities.
Syringe Exchange Programs
Syringe exchanges provide free sterile syringes in exchange for used syringes to reduce transmission of blood-borne pathogens among injection-drug users. Moreover, they serve as information clearinghouses for individuals who are facing a wide range of health-related risks - including drug overdose - and may be receptive to being connected with services.
Here in Washington, syringe exchange programs have been in operation since they first becamse legal in 1988, with approximately twenty currently operating throughout the state. At the end of 2009, Congress finally ended the ban on federal funding of syringe exchange programs that had been in place since their inception. However, these programs are still short on funds, and the federal government could do a great deal more to make these programs part of the solution for combating opiate abuse.
911 Good Samaritan Laws and Naloxone
The federal government should also consider advocating for 911 Good Samaritan laws and easing access to the drug naloxone (which can reverse an opiate overdose).
911 Good Samaritan laws provide limited criminal immunity for individuals that seek medical help in an overdose situation. Washington became only the second state to pass such a law in 2010. Naloxone is an opiate antagonist that can save someone from an overdose. Programs that have distributed naloxone to persons at risk for an opiate overdose have been extremely successful.
The federal response to prescription opiate abuse should not ignore these powerful harm reduction strategies for reversing our nation's alarming rise in overdose deaths. Supervised syringe injection facilities, syringe exchange programs, 911 Good Samaritan laws, and naloxone distribution should be part of the solution for the overdose problem, which includes heroin as well as prescription opiates. These programs save lives, prevent crimes, prevent the spread of disease, and provide us with life-saving outreach opportunities.
What return have we seen from increased investment in criminalization, law enforcement, and punishment? More arrests, perhaps, but more deaths, too. Let’s move forward with smart harm reduction policies and prevent as many unnecessary deaths as possible.
- Printer-friendly version |
- Like (30 Likes)|
- Send by email






Opioid wars
Unfortunately the "war on drugs' is morphing into the "war on pain sufferers!" The true chronic pain patient is an easy target and so are the few remaining doctors willing or able to treat them. There are practices that over the years accumulate a significant number of true chronic pain patients who use opioids. They are not addicts! they do not seek to constantly increase their dose. They do not doctor shop. They do not call for "early" refills. They are true sufferers and there is no cure for their disease. Unfortunately the whitehouse plan clearly targets "quantity of pills prescribed" as the primary target of the new innitiative.
True patients get no protection the way "addicts" do with their reduced sentences, they only suffer more pain. They are villified and mischaracterized and prejudiciously and wrongfully judged. THey often have other serious and life threatening problems misdiagnosed because everyone knows they are "just addicts!" No one keeps track of the injuries that happen to the undertreated and/or mistreated chronic pain patient, but the numbers of injuries, if not deaths, would make the complications of misused opioids pale by comparison.
They generally have no voice and no resources. It is interesting that not one PainTreatment Group was included in the Whitehous statement.
Prejudice in America is alive and well, and the true chronic pain patient is paying the real price.
opiate prescriptions
I understand the concern about pain sufferers referenced in the letter above, but I work with drug addicted children and parents and the word from them (and other citizens) is that doctors tend to over-prescribe these medicines and for pain that just as easily could have been treated with something less addictive as a start. Also, I have found some doctors to be unresponsive to conversations about the dangers of this type of prescribing.
Some of the people we serve started out using prescription pain killers (for kids it's often pills found in bathroom cabinets) and then moved into IV Heroin use, because the pills were too expensive. And also, yes! Adults prone to misuse doctor shop and there is no connecting system that tracks this, so even with a knowledgeable, careful doctor, the patient can take way more than they should. The whole system DOES need a re-write, with the understanding that yes, people have pain, but please! Consider the patients prior drug and/or alcohol abuse history and genetic predisposition to addiction before prescribing these lethal drugs.
Overdose Deaths
I'm a college student at Clark College in Vancouver WA working on my degree in Chemical Dependance Counseling, and an intern with Clark County Public Health Harm Reduction Center. I'm there about 5 to 7 hours a week and see many young and older adults strugling with opiate addiction. Through out my time at the exchange I talk to people and encourage them to use safe injection practices single needle use and keeping a clean site for their injection articles. A program that would include Narcan, and the training of the use of Narcan is a program that has been proven to work in Chicago, New York and in Vancouver B.C.
Opiate overdose deaths are not going to go away with out help, our help. With a Narcan program in place and properly organized countless lives could be saved, The arguement that having Narcan as a "safety net" for injection drug users is really without merrit, and letting them die because they use is just asinine, with help, compassion, and understanding many that use could find their way to a way of life that is clean and sober...I did it 24 years ago, and if I can do it anyone can
naloxazone
Naloxazone is a refinement of naloxone that is permanent. It is not dangerous and could be offered to every addict by doctors/hospitals and facilities such as Insight. Why is this not done? I am witnessing a terrible withdrawal from hydromorphone, unsupported excepting for what I can provide, and am unable to locate a physician who will prescribe this. If I take this person to Florida, apparently we can get it, or maybe I can find a closer place. So far, though, that's the best that's on offer.
My friend thinks the government does not want addicts cured, and I am beginning to think along those lines.If anyone knows how I can get a doctor to give my friend an injection in the Vancouver/Victoria area, please let me know. Thank you.
Post new comment